Peter + Travis are okay with use and do not major concerns
Peter has concern about non-participants hijacking (strip mining) the community
How do we protect ourselves from these type of actions?
Form a consortium
mamba, boa and quetz do not use "conda" to avoid trademark infringement
Might change if there were rules for using the conda name
Papertrail giving conda-forge and other communities permission to use the conda "name"
bioconda related?
Specifications
Compatibility vs Maintainance
Would like to see a voting aspect to specification
Roadmap for specs
Support
In phase one, support would be provided by the projects themselves
Governance
Proposal: Use conda-forge governance doc for this, modify for use case
core group is ~folks on this call
Commit rights should be maintained as projects move to new organizations
Initially individual projects would retain their own governance but be under the conda organization
Bootstrapping voting body
allow ppl to sign up, you have to vote to be in
README should include who runs them (Anaconda, QuantStack, individuals). Should include information on what level of support is provided and how to ask for it